Timeframe Agreement

Last updated 2026-09-24

Whether the two measured time frames, 45 and 20 trading days, put a name on the same side, and since when. It follows the linked name.

At a glance

What it shows

PartWhat it is
Edge over any stockThe probability minus the any stock figure for the same side, each trading day.
The dotThe signal rule was met that trading day.
Side at each time frameSignal zone, outside the middle band, or the middle, per time frame and per trading day.
Secondary signalsExpected move, pullback risk and volatility outlook, next 20 trading days.

The middle band. Ranks from 20 to 80 are too close to the middle of the ranking to call a side. It is also, near enough, where the measured outlook stops clearing any stock by 2 points.

Reading it well

  1. Read the top line. It answers the question the pane is named for.
  2. Look for a run of dots. A signal held day after day, or switching on and off, reads at a glance.
  3. Read the columns for the probability's path. A growing column is a name moving deeper into its band.
  4. Set the 45 and 20 strips side by side. Where both are strong, both measured time frames sit in their signal zones.

Frequently asked questions

Where did the rings and the 3 of 3 count go? They were built for seven time frames, where agreement across all of them picked a book. Under the model serving tonight the signal is the 45 or the 20 trading day band, and the 10 day rank failed its holdout. A count that included it was not a figure worth weighing. Does more agreement mean a higher probability? No. The probability is measured for the band, whatever the other time frame says. Agreement is a fact about the two ranks. What does the expected move mean here? The second model's size of move over the next 20 trading days, either way. It is not a price target.